Tuesday, March 27, 2012

Tebow or Sanchez ?






Something dramatic. That’s what the Jets do after the Giants win the Superbowl. Win in 2008? Sign Favre. Win again in 2012? Sign Tebow. But will the Jets dramatic move to be the popular NY team pay off this time? Many people think it won’t, and Tebow will just be a 2nd string qb? Which doesn’t make sense; it’d be a waste of money and not to mention talent.
There’s no doubt that Tebow can produce on the field, even though he’s barely out of college. And from the looks of it, Tebow will sadly be a bench warmer. Earlier today, the owner of the Jets (Woody Johnson), was quick to make it clear, that Sanchez was their starting quarterback, and that he trusted him enough to give Sanchez an extension. He even went as far as to comment on how consistence Sanchez is.
While that mostly true, he hasn’t been consistently good. Rather, he’s  been consistently mediocre. Johnson was asked whether or not Sanchez would be benched if his performance was subpar, which he refused to answer. But the facts are, even though Tebow is inexperienced he’s performed better than Sanchez in almost every way.
For instance, Sanchez has had a total of 43 interceptions, and he’s played just 40 games. While Tebow has played just 16 games and only has 3 interceptions. The two players’ pass completions are within 5% of each other. But who knows, maybe a situation similar to Kyle Orton’s will happen in the Jets camp, allowing Tebow to show he is the better qb. He’ll only get better with time!




Read More

2 comments:

  1. I believe that this is Mark Sanchez's year.

    Whether that is a good or bad thing will be up to him...........but this is the time where he either earns his pay, or proves he's not worth it.

    After this year, it will be 100% clear who the starting quarterback will be out of the two. If Sanchez is mediocre, he's gone, or at least put on the bench, and if he's great, then it's over for Tebow.

    But only time will tell.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Great post - used your words very effectively - each one had meaning, backing up your point of view. Liked it a lot.

    ReplyDelete